Rebuild Chinatown Initiative
Spacer Spacer
Spacer
Spacer Spacer
>
Contact Us Right Spacer
ImageImageImageImage
Left SpacerAbout RCIPartnersNewsEventsRCI ResourcesAbout ChinatownRight Spacer
Spacer
Spacer


Columbia University Urban Planning Studio
Midterm Presentation
(Preliminary Summary and Analysis of Opportunities & Challenges)
Monday, March 31, 2003

Summary of Notes

Attendance of Community Representatives:
Alex Chu, Eastbank
Eddy Eng, Director of BID Operations, NYC Dept. of Small Business Services
Peter Cheng, Indochina Sino-American Community Center
Narisara Vanichanan, Lower Manhattan Cultural Council
Marnie McGregor, NYIRN
H.T. Chen, H.T. Chen and Dancers
Frank Lang, AAFE
Drew Kiriazides, AAFE
Robert Weber, AAFE
Jennifer Sun, AAFE
Ken Bowers, PPSA

Chinatown's Strengths:
Economic Diversity: manufacturing, banking, wholesale
Immigrant Community
Densely-Populated
Live-Work Neighborhood
Accessible Location
Sense of Place

Chinatown's Challenges:
Rising real estate prices
Changing employment base
Inadequate Housing
Lack of Open Space
Pedestrian Congestion
Sanitation
Political Disempowerment

Study Area Definition (same as the area defined by AAFNY):
Broadway (west)
Norfolk and Montgomery (east)
Spring and Rivington (north)
Worth Street and South Street (south)
75-100% of Asians in census tracts, based on 2000 Census
Tracts with concentrations of garment factories

Land Use Survey
Data Sources: RPAD + AAFE Land Use Survey
Spot-checked approximately 400 lots that had discrepancies, missing data, etc.
Maps Generated:
Land Use Map,
Entire Building Land Use Map,
Ground Floor Land Use Map,
Upper Flours Commercial,
Residential and Manufacturing Zones
32.5% of lots surveyed = soft sites
1.6% of lots surveyed = vacant buildings
0.7% of lots surveyed = vacant land
0.3% of lots surveyed = buildings under construction

Economic Development:
Erosion of garment, printing and wholesale due to real estate pressures G zone does not prevent conversion of manufacturing into commercial uses.

Transportation:
Regional perspective: inadequacies of Canal Street Based on one-day traffic count, 40% of two-way traffic along Canal was commercial; Inadequate Sidewalks Lack of Parking Access Problems from neighboring communities Brooklyn Bridge is a wasted opportunity for stronger connection.

Housing:
Old housing stock: over 90% build before 1920
Internal conditions are poor;
Exterior walls are relatively sound, rehab is a possibility;

Community Services:
Lack of training programs
Budget instability (need for permanent sources of funding)
Elderly: more live in poverty than city's elderly population

Future Projects (between now and May 5th, the day of final presentation):
Pedestrian Study
Targeted Land Use Study and Analysis
Detailed Visions and Recommendations

Four Proposed Visions for Chinatown (not mutually exclusive or comprehensive):
1. Manufacturing Center
2. Residential Neighborhood
3. Commercial Hub: incubate new industries, international links
4. Tourist Destination

Questions and Comments:
What new industries have you identified?

  • Need further study, but medical and wedding planning services are the kinds of services that could be supported and expanded upon.
  • The Studio is researching the benefits of an Empire Zone for Chinatown businesses.
Informal economy: how to formalize?

Training Programs: what are alternative sources of funding?

Need for discipline: community infrastructure embodies the physical, cultural and financial.
  • Physical: transportation, housing
  • Cultural: ability of community to change old ways? Are they ready to make the leap to new ideas and ways of doing things?
  • Financial: How does the community not rely on government for resources? Ability of community to generate internal wealth and international links.
  • All of these factors make up a sense of place. Need to test each vision to evaluate how inter-related factors will be affected.
  • How to recast new ideas so community is more receptive?

Create a matrix of sources of resources for community development: identify what the private, public, private-public, non-profit sectors can contribute.
  • BID is example of successful private-public partnerships.
How much land is Asian/Chinese-owned?

Where are the trucks going?

Need to take into consideration that 30% of Chinatown population is non-Asian, and they're affecting transformation of the community (i.e. emergence of boutiques that are replacing ethnic businesses).

What are potential waterfront linkages?

What are you going to do with the buses?

Greater amenities can support greater density.
  • Identify areas that can support higher density (FAR).

How to create community funds for development? (i.e. linkage fee for conversion of manufacturing into commercial uses that would fund relocation of garment factories).

Approach Chinatown as a multi-nodal system (i.e. the creation of several nodes may help address the bus problem). Chinatown should have multiple points for delivering different kinds of services.
  • Keep the buses moving so they don't have to fight for parking (i.e. NYU downtown bus)
Need to evaluate historical trends for demographic changes, particularly in terms of educational attainment, industries, and occupations, and project trends for youth and working-age population.

Park Row is important corridor for office workers and tourists to flow from Lower Manhattan to Chinatown.

Existing and new industries for Chinatown that lessen dependency of businesses on Chinese customers for economic viability: jewelry and transportation (i.e. inter-Chinatown buses whose customers are largely non-Asian).

What services and businesses will attract Chinese and Asian Americans from the suburbs if the larger and cleaner supermarkets diminish their need to come to Chinatown for produce?

Importance of cultural activities for bringing people to Chinatown:
  • Approximately 200 kids come to H.T. Chen and Dancers on Saturdays for classes. Each child brings approximately 3 family members, which means about 600-700 people visit Chinatown as a result of the classes.

How to create more open space?
  • The Studio is in the process of comparing the amount of open space in Chinatown to rest of the city;
  • The community may not need additional open space, but rather, better access to existing and proposed parks in Lower Manhattan.
  • Enhance pedestrian access to East River Park;
  • Idea: green roofing to provide recreational space for families.
Return to top
 



About RCI | Partners | News | Events | RCI Resources | About Chinatown

Site Designed by Civic Resource Group
Copyright 2005 Rebuild Chinatown Initiative